5 reasons your website isn't converting, and how to fix them
Getting traffic but no enquiries? Here are five common reasons your website isn't converting visitors into leads, and practical fixes for...
The number matters less than you think. What's behind it matters more.
Someone told you to check your PageSpeed score. You ran the test, got a number, and now you're not sure whether to panic or move on.
If you scored above 90, you're in good shape. If you scored below 50, you've got a problem. But most business websites land somewhere in the middle, and that's where the confusion lives.
Here's what the scores actually mean, what they're measuring, and when it's worth doing something about it.
Google's PageSpeed Insights tool tests your website against two things: lab data (a simulated test of how your site loads under controlled conditions) and field data (how real Chrome users actually experience your site).
The field data is what matters for rankings. It's based on the Core Web Vitals, three metrics that Google uses as a ranking signal:
how long until the main content on the page is visible. Under 2.5 seconds is good.
how quickly the page responds when someone clicks a button or taps a link. Under 200 milliseconds is good.
how much the page layout shifts around while loading. Under 0.1 is good.
Your site is well-optimised. Core Web Vitals are passing. There might be marginal improvements available, but nothing urgent. Focus your energy elsewhere, content, conversion, marketing.
Your site is functional and probably not hurting you badly, but there are gains available. Common issues in this range: images that could be better compressed, one or two render-blocking scripts, or a server that's slightly slow to respond. A focused optimisation session could push you into the 90s.
This is where speed starts to visibly affect your business. Visitors on mobile connections are experiencing noticeable delays. Bounce rates are likely higher than they should be. Google may be penalising your rankings relative to faster competitors. An audit is worthwhile.
Your site has significant performance issues that are almost certainly affecting traffic, conversions, and rankings. At this level, the problems are usually structural, not something a few quick fixes will solve. You need to understand whether the issue is hosting, the platform, the code, or all three.
PageSpeed scores are useful shorthand, but they're not the whole picture. A few things to keep in mind:
A lightning-fast site with confusing navigation and weak content will still underperform. Speed removes a barrier, it doesn't replace good design and copy.
Running the same test twice can produce slightly different results depending on server load, network conditions, and other variables. Don't obsess over a 2-point difference. Look at the trend, not the individual number.
Google Analytics, chat widgets, cookie consent banners, and marketing pixels all add JavaScript that affects your score. These tools have value, but each one has a performance cost. The question isn't "should I remove them all", it's "are they each worth what they cost?"
A WordPress site with a heavy theme and 15+ plugins will struggle to break into the high 80s on mobile no matter how much optimisation you do. The overhead is architectural. If you've tried everything and you're stuck, the platform might be the limiting factor.
maintain it. Keep images optimised, audit third-party scripts occasionally, and monitor your field data in Google Search Console.
a targeted optimisation pass is worthwhile. Focus on images, render-blocking resources, and server response time. These three usually account for the biggest gains.
get a proper audit done before spending money on fixes. You need to know whether the issues are quick wins or structural problems, because the approach is completely different.